
Red as rowan berries
120 x 80cm

Red as a bed
80cm sq

Everything is free now, that’s what they say
100cm sq canvas +painted onto frame

Red as rowan berries
120 x 80cm

Red as a bed
80cm sq

Everything is free now, that’s what they say
100cm sq canvas +painted onto frame



Crosscurrents so far includes 3 paintings
#1 80cm sq on canvas
#2a 80 x 110cm on birch panel
#2b 110 x 80cm on birch panel

80cm sq
Was pondering on Yves Klein(though this isn’t ‘his’ blue)
Was seeing the green blot on Degas’s monotype in the New York MOMA show which seems to be seared on my retina
Was messing about with a ‘paint over’ of an old canvas
Was pondering more on how Franz Kline had the confidence to make such enormous sweeping marks
And then this morning there was a debate on Instagram about whether we should disregard other artists’ work for fear of replicating – or ‘chew them up’ and spit them out
I’m all for the chewing idea


Made both of these this morning
Top one is called “So beautiful, so what”
120cm sq
Bottom one is called “OnceI was the ocean floor, now I am a mountain range”
80cm sq
I’ve been listening to Paul Simon lately!
Both available through the Doorway Gallery in Dublin soon





I have just finished these 3
On the ‘drying wall’ in my studio
The stark light patches are both disrupting and essential ingredients in my studio life! I have an ambiguous love affair with skylights
Landmark 1 / the path
120 x 80cm
Details from Landmark 1/ the path
Landmark 2 / shadows
60cm sq
Details from Landmark 2/ shadows
Landmark 3 / lightshaft
80cm sq
Details from Landmark 3 / lightshaft
Notes:
1.In November 2014 I visited Ceide Fields – a neolithic site in North Mayo where they have discovered 52 miles of stone boundary walls from a farming settlement over 5000 years old.
2. This year I am lucky enough to be heading to San Francisco and New York to visit some major art galleries exibiting the works of the American Abstract Expressionists and I am particularly looking forward to seeing some of Richard Diebenkorn’s paintings in ‘the flesh’
I have come to realise recently how much it helps me to know something about the history or interests of an artist in order to more fully appreciate their work. That’s not to undermine in any way the importance of the solely visual impact. And I definitely don’t like the verbiage and arts peak that goes into many ‘artists statements’. I’m searching for a middle ground and would welcome comments
Last piece of coarse jute off the roll
120cm x 190cm
May sky
Using a brush to block in the shapes
Maybe done
Footnote: I was given a fabulous book on #RichardDiebenkorn for my 60th birthday. I am enthralled by his famous shifts from abstraction to figuration and back again, and am particularly drawn to his paintings with human and animal forms ambiguously appearing within his landscapes.
The curvaceous shapes in these clouds seemed to appear initially by their own volition, but of course I then exaggerated them. Maybe also with Matisse in mind. And someone said maybe a nod to Magritte too! Haha! Good company 🙂